Phototherapy is clearly enjoying a moment. You can now buy glowing gadgets for everything from complexion problems and aging signs along with sore muscles and gum disease, the newest innovation is an oral care tool outfitted with miniature red light sources, described by its makers as “a significant discovery for domestic dental hygiene.” Internationally, the industry reached $1 billion in 2024 and is forecast to expand to $1.8 billion by 2035. Options include full-body infrared sauna sessions, that employ light waves rather than traditional heat sources, your body is warmed directly by infrared light. According to its devotees, it’s like bathing in one of those LED-lit beauty masks, enhancing collagen production, soothing sore muscles, reducing swelling and long-term ailments as well as supporting brain health.
“It sounds a bit like witchcraft,” notes a Durham University professor, professor in neuroscience at Durham University and a convert to the value of light therapy. Of course, we know light influences biological functions. Sunlight helps us make vitamin D, crucial for strong bones, immune defense, and tissue repair. Light exposure controls our sleep-wake cycles, as well, activating brain chemicals and hormonal responses in daylight, and winding down bodily functions for sleep as it fades into night. Daylight-simulating devices are standard treatment for winter mood disorders to boost low mood in winter. So there’s no doubt we need light energy to function well.
Whereas seasonal affective disorder devices typically employ blue-range light, most other light therapy devices deploy red or infrared light. During advanced medical investigations, such as Chazot’s investigations into the effects of infrared on brain cells, determining the precise frequency is essential. Light is a form of electromagnetic radiation, which runs the spectrum from the lowest-energy, longest wavelengths (radio waves) to high-energy gamma radiation. Light-based treatment uses wavelengths around the middle of this spectrum, the highest energy of those being invisible ultraviolet, followed by visible light encompassing rainbow colors and finally infrared detectable with special equipment.
Dermatologists have utilized UV therapy for extensive periods to manage persistent skin disorders including eczema and psoriasis. It affects cellular immune responses, “and suppresses swelling,” says Dr Bernard Ho. “There’s lots of evidence for phototherapy.” UVA goes deeper into the skin than UVB, in contrast to LEDs in commercial products (which generally deliver red, infrared or blue light) “generally affect surface layers.”
Potential UVB consequences, including sunburn or skin darkening, are recognized but medical equipment uses controlled narrow-band delivery – signifying focused frequency bands – which decreases danger. “It’s supervised by a healthcare professional, meaning intensity is regulated,” explains the dermatologist. Most importantly, the devices are tuned by qualified personnel, “to confirm suitable light frequency output – different from beauty salons, where it’s a bit unregulated, and emission spectra aren’t confirmed.”
Red and blue light sources, he explains, “aren’t really used in the medical sense, though they might benefit some issues.” Red light devices, some suggest, enhance blood flow, oxygen absorption and cell renewal in the skin, and promote collagen synthesis – a key aspiration in anti-ageing effects. “Studies are available,” comments the expert. “Although it’s not strong.” Regardless, amid the sea of devices now available, “we don’t know whether or not the lights emitted are reflective of the research that has been done. Appropriate exposure periods aren’t established, proper positioning requirements, if benefits outweigh potential risks. There are lots of questions.”
Initial blue-light devices addressed acne bacteria, microorganisms connected to breakouts. The evidence for its efficacy isn’t strong enough for it to be routinely prescribed by doctors – even though, explains the specialist, “it’s frequently employed in beauty centers.” Some of his patients use it as part of their routine, he observes, but if they’re buying a device for home use, “we just tell them to try it carefully and to make sure it has been assessed for safety. Without proper medical classification, oversight remains ambiguous.”
Meanwhile, in advanced research areas, researchers have been testing neural cells, revealing various pathways for light-enhanced cell function. “Pretty much everything I did with the light at that particular wavelength was positive and protective,” he states. Multiple claimed advantages have created skepticism toward light treatment – that it’s too good to be true. However, scientific investigation has altered his perspective.
The scientist mainly develops medications for neurological conditions, but over 20 years ago, a doctor developing photonic antiviral treatment consulted his scientific background. “He designed tools for biological testing,” he explains. “I was pretty sceptical. This particular frequency was around 1070 nanometers, that many assumed was biologically inert.”
The advantage it possessed, nevertheless, was its efficient water penetration, allowing substantial bodily penetration.
Additional research indicated infrared affected cellular mitochondria. Mitochondria are the powerhouses of cells, generating energy for them to function. “Every cell in your body has mitochondria, including the brain,” notes the researcher, who prioritized neurological investigations. “Studies demonstrate enhanced cerebral circulation with light treatment, which is always very good.”
With 1070 treatment, energy organelles generate minimal reactive oxygen compounds. At controlled levels these compounds, says Chazot, “triggers guardian proteins that maintain organelle health, protect cellular integrity and manage defective proteins.”
All of these mechanisms appear promising for treating a brain disease: oxidative protection, inflammation reduction, and cellular cleanup – self-digestion mechanisms eliminating harmful elements.
Upon examining current studies on light therapy for dementia, he states, approximately 400 participants enrolled in multiple trials, incorporating his preliminary American studies